Media 111 – Module 4 – Weekly Essay

Posted on by jesse

Bad Photoshop and Star Wars Innovation

Right-wing propagandist view of Biden's America vs. Trump's America
Right-wing propagandist view of Biden’s America vs. Trump’s America.

Influence via Photoshop – 

First off, I would like to begin by saying that I am a very non-political person and am not taking any sides here. I consider myself to be a centrist. I personally feel like using Photoshop to influence individuals to vote a certain way, is completely inappropriate, biased, and unfair. I would go as far as saying this photo is right-wing propaganda. For starters, I feel like we have seen events from both sides of the image happen under both of the different presidents’ tenures. I remember a time when cities were on fire under Trump. I also know there have been happy times under Biden. Both of these individuals have their ups and downs, pros and cons. Something else that really stands out about how this was photoshopped is how the “artist” manipulated colors and levels. You can see on Biden’s side it’s very dark and gloomy, while on Trump’s side it’s very bright and warm. This work of art sends a biased and one-sided message. I feel like biased and one-sided messages can influence people in negative ways.

How Art Advances Technology – 

Art advances technology. In the case of Star Wars, it would appear that the brothers, John and Thomas Knoll, came up with the desire and drive to create Photoshop because they needed a program that would better and more efficiently help them express their works of art. Over the years, as Photoshop is used more and more, other artists find areas that are lacking or come up with new ideas of features to add to the software that would help them with their art. I am just using Photoshop as an example here. I would say that this concept applies to innovative technological advances in the arts as a whole.

Media 111 – Module 3 – Weekly Essay

Posted on by jesse

Color Use and Challenges

For starters, the infographic provided on this page really helped me compare UX with UI in a whole new light, but yes, color absolutely makes a difference! The whole idea behind universal design (UD) is that there be ease of access. The product should be developed with everybody in mind. Anyone should be able to access it and use it without hitting roadblocks. The goal is to make it as easy to use as possible.

One of the things that makes it easier to use is using colors properly. There a decent percentage of people out there who have some form of colorblindness. This makes it harder or them to distinguish between different colors. We want to keep that in mind when drawing up our color palettes for projects. We want to avoid using colors that are commonly associated with colorblindness right next to each other because they can blend with each from a colorblind individual’s perspective. We also want to make sure that we also use a high contrast color palette. This makes it easier for the user to read and see information.

It sounds like the UX contributor would be more responsible for the basic framework of the product while the UI contributor would be more in charge of the graphic design portion. Therefore, the urgency of color usage is probably more pertinent to the UI professional, but is still important for the UX designer to keep in mind. The proper use of colors in the interface design also help create and embolden a company’s branding identity and make the product more appealing to the user. This creates a more memorable experience, therefore could lead to the consumer recommending it to another potential user. 

Colors can have meaning or messages of their own. Especially in the aspect of product and company branding. I feel that the GPP of a robot could relate to it’s color because it may influence their general overall attitude and moods. For example: if the robot was gray or blue, maybe it would have a depressed personality? If the robot was red, maybe it could be angry or dangerous. If it was green, it could be happy and go-lucky. Maybe not. Maybe I’m wrong about that and there is a better answer to that. You be the judge!

Media 111 – Module 1 – Weekly Essay

Posted on by jesse

The Bauhaus

I found an interesting page on History.com that talked about the Bauhaus. I found this to be very intriguing! I had never heard of the Bauhaus before this class. I learned that not only is it a place, or a school if you will, but it is also an artistic movement that can still be seen everywhere around us to this very day.

The Bauhaus was a school that opened in Germany in 1919, where students and instructors of all walks of life came together and worked in tandem to create abstract works, with little emotion. They combined artistry with architecture and craftsmanship to produce things like household furniture. Their designs were renowned and mass produced. This school also offered women a chance to pursue their artistic endeavors, considering that this was hard for women to do in Germany, especially during the reign of the Nazi regime, who eventually forced the school to close in the year 1933. The Nazis of course viewed the teachings of the school as being embedded with Soviet Communist values, so the Nazis insisted that they replace some of the staff members at the school with Nazis. The faculty refused this and was forced to shut down the Nazi regime.